The source of the debate of Battlefield 3 vs Modern Warfare 3 like most debates, is about which is better, and in turn relates to which is more shit. Battlefield has always been about open realistic military operations whereas call of duty is about arcady style jumping around run and gun fun, so does this make them different, NO! They are both in the same genre, they both provide similar experiences, they are both military fps in the modern age, they have little differences here and there, but they are more similar than pretty much any other game series, so it is automatically bound by competition, to see which game is better, and which one is worth buying.
Looking at Battlefield 3 vs MW3, we can obviously see the victor, why, graphics, gameplay, features, rewarding experience, engine, technology, etc, all the evidence is there. Remember opinions don't matter in debates like these, in court opinions are regarded as "hearsay" and are rejected by the rules of evidence, saying one is better or worse out of complete opinion doesn't prove anything will get you no where, you need evidence, and Battlefield 3's got it. So what does this lead to, well of course, Battlefield 3 is the better game, but why do people call modern warfare 3 and the rest of the Call of Duty's shit, lets see?
Similar games genres are always competitive, one has to surpass the other to be successful,in Battlefield v Call of Duty, we can see that Call of Duty has always been the more popular one, this has lead a huge variety of FPS (first person shooter) fans to play it, even Battlefield fans like myself. But what happens when a better game comes out, an extremely similar game that is better in pretty much every way, and when you play it, you release how shit Call of Duty really is, why?, its because the other game has simply surpassed it. Battlefield has surpassed call of duty, we've got evidence to prove it, although they are both fun, it makes complete sense to play the better game, and when one game is better than the other, out of comparison, we can see that Call of Duty is shit.
Call of Duty is still 'ok' in its own right, Battlefield doesn't make Call of Duty any worse, but what Battlefield has done is raise the industry standards, the standards of polished quality first person shooters, Battlefield's innovation has paid off with a (almost) new generation of the military FPS genre, one which is better than the old one in pretty much every way (because of the evidence), so if we look at it, Battlefield successfully risen FPS standards to a whole new level, this level now becomes the norm as competition and innovation in the industry rise to embrace the future, thanks to Battlefield, we'll be seeing even better FPS's trying to do what Battlefield has done and aim for the top.
But what about Call of Duty? its been fallen behind in the standards, after playing the new high quality FPS and then going back to Call of Duty, we see how shit it really is, because Battlefield has surpassed Call of Duty, our interests, ideals, and values of the FPS have all risen beyond the point of Call of Duty, and we can only see how crap the game really is because of how better the others are. One game alone cannot destroy another, but a major innovation of the industry can.
Ive played Battlefield and Call of Duty, and i can say that Battlefield is better, (this my opinion), i tried to play Call of Duty for a little while, and i though it was, plainly and basically, shit, why?, simply because of how better Battlefield is (evidence). This is a popular opinion with many other FPS fans, and its this wave of opinions caused from Battlefield innovation and success that will (slowly but surly) destroy Call of Duty, unless it finally drops its "if it ant broke, don't fix it" motto and trys to innovate and embrace the future battlefield has provided for the FPS military genre, which we all know wont happen anytime soon, even if it does, it will never overtake Battlefield in the race for the best.
Playing Call of Duty after Battlefield is like playing an old rusty piano after a grand piano, yes, the old rusty piano was good while it lasted, but after playing the grand, we can seem just like call of duty, how shit it really is.
-
P.S. dont mind this, ;) this is simply my respose to the post cleft made eariler, although i see nothing wrong with it, i do enjoy friendley debates here and there and when Battlefield and Call of Duty is mentioned... ohhh. i go crazy (i dont like swearing either, but in this context, i dont use it for offence, it use it for its strong descriptive meaning, not only did cleft use it, but saying 'crap' just doesn't cut it here)
No comments:
Post a Comment